2017-04-26                     House Journal                      Page 1223
HB 23                                                                                                                         
Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                                                  
House consider the Senate message (page 1183) on the following:                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
    CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 23(FIN) am                                                                                            
    "An Act creating a fund in the Department of Public Safety;                                                                 
    providing for payment of certain medical insurance premiums for                                                             

2017-04-26                     House Journal                      Page 1224
    surviving dependents of certain peace officers or firefighters who                                                          
    die in the line of duty; relating to contributions from permanent                                                           
    fund dividends to the peace officer and firefighter survivors' fund;                                                        
    and providing for an effective date."                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
and                                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
    SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 23(FIN)                                                                                 
    (same title)                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent to                                                                     
abstain from voting because of a conflict of interest.  Objection was                                                           
heard, and he was required to vote.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Representative Tuck rose to a point of order.                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
The Speaker cautioned the member to confine remarks to the changes                                                              
to the bill.                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Representative Tuck moved that the House concur in the Senate                                                                   
amendment and recommended that the members vote yes.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
The question being:  "Shall the House concur in the Senate                                                                      
amendment?"  The roll was taken with the following result:                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
SCS CSHB 23(FIN)                                                                                                                
Concur                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  38   NAYS:  2   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Birch, Chenault, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster,                                                              
Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Kito, Knopp,                                                             
Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Millett, Neuman, Ortiz, Parish,                                                                   
Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes,                                                                 
Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Westlake,                                                             
Wilson, Wool                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Nays:  Eastman, Kawasaki                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
And so, the House concurred in the Senate amendment, thus adopting                                                              
SCS CSHB 23(FIN).                                                                                                               

2017-04-26                     House Journal                      Page 1225
Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll                                                             
call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                                                              
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                            
                                                                                                                                
The bill was referred to the Chief Clerk for enrollment.